No live data required
Decision Twin built from parent process documentation and volume estimates. Works at design stage — before the GCC is operational.
GCC Heads
Building a GCC means making decisions before you have the baseline.
3-Cubed gives you the model before the operation exists. 15–20 design configurations evaluated before go-live.
You're designing team size, location, shift structure, and control architecture without historical performance data from the parent entity. Every decision rests on assumptions.
THE CHALLENGE
Assumptions compound. Errors show up six months after go-live.
3-Cubed builds the model from parent process documentation and volume estimates — and runs scenarios before you commit the design. The cost of getting this wrong is measured in quarters, not weeks.
Where It Shows Up
- Team size and structure decided without performance baseline
- Control architecture designed without knowing what the controls cost
- Location and shift decisions based on estimates, not modelled consequences
- SLA commitments made before the operation can validate them
How 3-Cubed Addresses It
Model the operation before it exists.
15–20 configurations evaluated
Team size, location, shift structure, control architecture — each configuration with full cost, control, and SLA consequences.
Compliance-ready control architecture
Identifies the control design that meets compliance requirements without over-engineering — and without the cost of finding out after go-live.
Committed to the right design
Go-live with a modelled baseline. Performance deviation visible immediately — against a computed target, not a spreadsheet estimate.
GCC Heads — Computed Outputs
3-Cubed Outcomes,
Before Commitment
Each Metric Computed Across The Full PROFIT Lever Interaction. Each Tile Shows Which Levers Drove The Outcome.
Cost
4.2%
Cost Base Reduction
Required FTE59 FTE
Infra Cost−22%
· Unit Economics · Investor Lens
Driven By
- Operations88%
- IT68%
- Finance52%
Client Experience
13.2 DAYS
Cycle Time Reduction
First-time Right64%
Critical Path7.2 days
· Experience & Trust · Client Lens
Driven By
- Operations85%
- Process72%
- IT58%
Control
80%
Control Coverage
Lines of Defence3 LOD
Control Efficacy77.5%
· Risk & Compliance · Regulator Lens
Driven By
- Risk94%
- IT60%
- Process48%
Case Evidence
Where the model changed the design.
See case dataBanking: KYC / Compliance
Reduce cycle time, meet SLA
- Cost
- −40%
- Cycle
- −31%
- Control
- +4 pp
Banking: Reconciliation
Reduce cost, maintain SLAs
- Cost
- −42%
- Cycle
- —
- Control
- —
All cases anonymised by industry. Client names available under NDA.
−40%
Cost reduction (Banking KYC)
−31%
Cycle time reduction
15–20
Design configurations evaluated
See what happens before you decide.
Book a Demo